African American studies and postcolonial studies, while
distinct fields, share a common objective: to challenge and disrupt racial
hierarchies. Analyses of power dynamics between colonizers and the colonized
often parallel examinations of slavery and the relationships between masters
and slaves. In both the United States and other postcolonial contexts, the
enduring reality of discrimination and racism against minority populations
serves as a unifying thread, fostering a collective critique of neocolonialism.
This sentiment is echoed by renowned black feminist bell hooks, who asserts,
"I believe that black experience has been and continues to be one of
internal colonialism".
There exists a pressing need to decolonize the collective
mindset of contemporary America, driving current endeavors to reclaim and
unearth minority history and literature. Emerging sociological and literary
methodologies, such as Hazel Carby's seminal work "Reconstructing
Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist," prove
invaluable tools for recuperating the past and establishing culturally
sensitive frameworks for the future. Scholars like Henry Louis Gates, Barbara
Christian, Ella Shohat, and Homi Bhabha are bound by a shared determination to
engage in a dialogue of resistance and assertion.
African American studies and postcolonial studies share
common ground in their exploration of critical issues like representation,
essentialism, and nationalism. Within these disciplines, literature and
literary theory serve as potent tools for social commentary. Henry Louis Gates
advocates for debunking the notion of the supposed superiority of the
"Western tradition" over so-called "non-canonical traditions
like that of the Afro-American." In his work "The Signifying
Monkey," Gates vigilantly addresses the dangers of essentialism,
emphasizing the necessity "to create a fresh narrative space for
portraying the recurring theme of Afro-American literature, often referred to
as the Black Experience".
Similarly, Homi Bhabha, a prominent figure in cultural
studies and postcolonial criticism, echoes the call to dismantle essentialist
perspectives. He underscores the joint endeavor of postcolonial and black
critique in reshaping the conditions of expression at the level of signs,
cautioning against the mere establishment of new symbols of identity that might
inadvertently fuel uncritical "identity politics".
Scholarship in African American and postcolonial studies
frequently converges. Toni Morrison's "Playing in the Dark"
meticulously examines how white selfhood in American literary discourse is
shaped by the objectification of "black" presence. Edward Said's
groundbreaking work "Orientalism" similarly contends that European
culture derives strength and identity by positioning itself in opposition to
the Orient, forming a surrogate and often subterranean self.
In the anthology "Race, Writing and Difference"
edited by Henry Louis Gates, notable postcolonial critics like Gayatri C.
Spivak and Abdul R. JanMohamed contribute, showcasing the intersection of these
fields. Gates and Kwame Anthony Appiah, a scholar of Afro-American studies with
insights into postcolonial theory, co-edit a more recent anthology titled
"Identities." These instances of shared scholarship prompt a
reconsideration of fundamental questions regarding the politics of reading and
writing. They highlight the relevance of scholarly approaches that prioritize
culturally attuned modes of engaging in academic discourse.
The confluence of race, ethnicity, and gender politics has
sparked thought-provoking discourse within the works of bell hooks, Barbara
Christian, and Shirley Anne Williams—all distinguished African American
feminist critics. Likewise, the contributions of Gayatri Spivak and Chandra T.
Mohanty have been instrumental in these discussions. In this discourse,
patriarchy often serves as a metaphor, emblematic of power imbalances and a
root cause of colonial and neocolonial injustices. bell hooks, in her work
"Outlaw Culture," asserts, "For contemporary critics to condemn
the imperialism of the white colonizer without critiquing patriarchy is a
tactic that seeks to minimize the particular ways gender determines the
specific forms oppression may take within a specific group".
However, within this intersection of marginalized
perspectives lies the potential pitfall of totalization. Barbara Christian, in
her piece "Race for Theory," issues a caution against essentialist
portrayals of black womanhood, drawing parallels to the monolithic Black Arts
Movement of the 1960s and 70s. Chandra Mohanty similarly advocates against such
essentializing tendencies in the discourse surrounding Third World feminism.
Both fields, African American studies and postcolonial studies, call for
discussions on class. Hooks astutely addresses an often-overlooked issue in
cross-cultural feminist dialogue, noting, "We often forget that many Third
World nationals bring to this country the same kind of contempt and disrespect
for blackness that is most frequently associated with white imperialism".
Looking ahead, Ann Ducille's essay, "Postcolonialism
and Afrocentricity," not only underscores concerns regarding essentialism
in both disciplines but also raises the unsettling possibility of their
interchangeability. She observes, "Whereas the critique posed by African
American studies and the alternative (non-Eurocentric) worldview asserted by
Afrocentricity cut uncomfortably close to home, postcoloniality seems to offer
its opposition from a distance—as Gayatri Spivak might say, 'in other
worlds'".
Scholarship is trending towards a heightened self-awareness
of individual, subjective identities. One strategy to counter unproductive
generalizations of all "marginalized" voices involves a specific
deconstruction of "race." Gates, Christian, and Sara Suleri (as seen
in "Identities") are among those who push back against what they
perceive as an unproductive homogenization of all "minority"
discourses. The reconfiguration of American studies might serve as a fertile
ground for commonality, with scholars like Hazel Carby and Mario Garcia
challenging foundational tenets of American historiography. Meanwhile, critics
advocate for a deeper examination of the overlaps and distinctions between
multiculturalism, postcolonialism, and ethnic studies, all while addressing
their evolution in light of the persistent specter of cultural insularity.
No comments:
Post a Comment