Michelle Balaev's "Trauma Studies" (Summary)

 

 

The field of trauma studies revolves around the examination of psychological trauma, its portrayal in language, and the role of memory in shaping individual and cultural identities. Drawing from psychoanalytic theories on trauma and incorporating additional frameworks such as poststructuralism, sociocultural theory, and postcolonial theory, scholars analyze representations of extreme experiences and their effects on identity and memory.

 

Trauma is generally understood as a profoundly disruptive experience that deeply affects one's emotional organization and perception of the external world. Trauma studies explore its impact in literature and society by examining its psychological, rhetorical, and cultural significance. Scholars delve into the complex interplay of psychological and social factors that influence how individuals comprehend traumatic experiences and how language both shapes and is shaped by these experiences.

 

In its early stages during the 1990s, trauma studies heavily relied on Freudian theory to construct a model of trauma wherein extreme experiences were deemed essentially unrepresentable, challenging the limits of language and even rupturing meaning altogether. However, this traditional model has since been supplemented by a more pluralistic approach. This alternative perspective suggests that the assumed unspeakability of trauma is just one possible response to extreme events, rather than its defining characteristic.

 

While the notion that trauma challenges the limits of language and fragments the psyche continues to influence the field, alternative approaches have emerged, displacing this singular perspective. Nevertheless, the formal innovations of texts—whether in print or other media—that shed light on the ways identity, the unconscious, and remembering are influenced by traumatic events remain central to the discourse in trauma studies.

Starting with Freud

Freud's theories on traumatic experience and memory serve as foundational psychological concepts in the field of trauma studies. These theories emerged from the nineteenth-century study of shock and hysteria by researchers such as Joseph Breuer, Pierre Janet, Jean-Martin Charcot, and others, culminating in Freud's seminal works like "Studies on Hysteria" (1895) and "Beyond the Pleasure Principle" (1920).

 

In "Studies on Hysteria," Freud and Breuer proposed that traumatic hysteria arises from a repressed, earlier experience, particularly of sexual assault. They argued that the original event itself may not have been traumatic but becomes so through its remembrance. The process of remembering, often through psychotherapy like the talking cure or abreaction, is essential for understanding and overcoming the symptoms caused by the past event. Traumatic memories, termed "pathogenic reminiscences," inflict psychological pain and contribute to dissociation or splitting of the ego.

 

Freud's later work in "Beyond the Pleasure Principle" expanded on these ideas, focusing on traumatic neurosis and the compulsion to repeat the memory of painful events. Trauma is seen as both an external shock and an internal defense mechanism against overstimulation. Traumatic neurosis involves a breach in the protective barrier against stimuli, leading to the compulsion to repeat the traumatic memory in hopes of mastering the unpleasant feelings associated with it.

 

Freud emphasized the importance of narrative recall in integrating traumatic memories into the psyche. However, he remained ambivalent about the permanence of traumatic memory and whether experiences leave permanent traces in the mind. The medicalization of trauma culminated in the American Psychiatric Association's classification of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, marking trauma as a distinct psychological disorder characterized by intense fear, terror, and helplessness.

2

Literary Trauma Theory: Caruth and the First Wave

 

Freud's theories, particularly those regarding the compulsion to repeat traumatic experiences, the fragmentation of the psyche, and the unique nature of traumatic memory, have been instrumental in shaping the field of trauma studies. This area of scholarship explores how trauma influences memory, identity, and language, especially in literary texts where representations of extreme experiences are analyzed.

 

In the traditional Freudian model adopted by scholars like Cathy Caruth, trauma is perceived as an event that shatters consciousness and defies direct linguistic representation. Traumatic experiences are seen as unassimilated events that fracture identity and resist integration into narrative memory. Dissociation, a defense mechanism against overwhelming stimuli, is central to trauma, leading to its incomprehensibility and unspeakability. Trauma's impact on individuals and collective groups underscores the connection between personal and political realms, highlighting the universal effects of extreme experiences on consciousness and narrative recall.

 

Caruth's influential work, "Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, History" (1996), builds upon Freud's theories to explore trauma's disruptive influence on memory and language. She argues that traumatic experiences, whether individual or collective, are never fully known but are instead represented through fragmented narratives that gesture towards the incomprehensibility of the past. Trauma's paradoxical nature, wherein the desire to understand the past conflicts with the inability to fully grasp it, creates a tension between knowing and not knowing.

 

Caruth's analysis emphasizes the rhetorical potential of recurring motifs in texts, which symbolize the fragmented nature of traumatic memory and history. Trauma, as conceptualized in this model, defies easy assimilation into the psyche and memory, resulting in a distorted and approximate recall rather than a determinate knowledge. Additionally, Caruth incorporates neurobiological perspectives, such as Bessel van der Kolk's concept of "speechless terror," to underscore trauma's profound impact on consciousness and its resistance to linguistic organization.

The concept of trauma's transhistorical and intergenerational impact underscores its universal effects on identity and memory, both at the individual and collective levels. Cathy Caruth, drawing on Freud's theories, suggests that trauma transcends time and implicates individuals across generations in each other's traumas. This perspective highlights trauma's infectious potential and its ability to persist outside of linear time, defying narrative assimilation into memory.

 

The connection between individual and collective experiences of trauma emphasizes the fragmentation or dissociation of consciousness, leading to a temporal gap in which the meaning of the experience remains indeterminate. Caruth argues that trauma disrupts the mind's experience of time, causing emotional suffering and rendering the event unlocatable in a coherent narrative. Despite its unrepresentability, the traumatic past continues to exert its influence on consciousness, creating an absence that gestures towards the event's existence while resisting epistemological or ethical determinacy.

 

This notion of trauma's unrepresentability has been central to subsequent scholarship in the field, with scholars such as J. Brooks Bouson, Suzette Henke, Deborah Horvitz, Michael Rothberg, and Laurie Vickroy expanding upon Caruth's framework. While maintaining the traditional Freudian-Caruthian concept of trauma, these scholars incorporate feminist, race, and postcolonial theories to analyze the social and cultural implications of extreme experiences and traumatic memory.

 

For example, Bouson examines the trauma of racist institutions endured by the African American community in Toni Morrison's novels, while Vickroy explores the formal innovations in narratives of trauma in contemporary fiction. Rothberg situates his analysis within a cultural studies framework, examining how traumatic experience produces both a narrative mode and a social response that reflect on the formal limits of representation.

3

Pluralistic Trauma Theory: A New Model

Criticism in trauma studies has evolved into a theoretical pluralism that challenges the traditional Caruthian model, which emphasizes trauma's unspeakable nature and its dissociative effects on consciousness and memory. This pluralistic approach seeks to understand not only the structural dimensions of trauma but also its cultural dimensions and the diversity of narrative expression it elicits. Rather than solely focusing on pathological fragmentation, this model suggests that traumatic experiences can lead to new understandings of the self and the world.

 

Scholars such as Ann Cvetkovich, Greg Forter, Amy Hungerford, Naomi Mandel, and others have contributed to this pluralistic perspective. In this model, trauma is seen as an event that alters perception and identity, leading to the formation of new knowledge about oneself and the external world. Traumatic events may result in an ambiguous understanding of the past, but they can also offer determinate meaning, highlighting the variability of traumatic experiences and their representations.

 

Unlike the traditional model, which often emphasizes trauma's inherent unspeakability, the pluralistic model acknowledges the influence of external cultural factors on the meaning of traumatic events. Memory, viewed as a fluid process of reconstruction rather than a static entity, is shaped by social and cultural contexts, impacting narrative recall and the creation of knowledge about the past.

 

This approach suggests that traumatic memory, while disruptive, may not always cause pathological symptoms that prevent its retrieval and assimilation into identity. Instead, the recollection process is influenced by cultural and historical contexts, shaping the narrative of traumatic memory and allowing for multiple determinacies of value.

 

By focusing on trauma's specificity and the cultural context of individual and collective experiences, this pluralistic model enables a deeper understanding of representations of extreme experiences such as rape, war, genocide, slavery, and colonial oppression. Scholars in this field emphasize the importance of considering social and cultural factors in interpreting trauma, moving beyond the notion of trauma as an unspeakable absence to explore its diverse meanings and impacts.

In "Against the Unspeakable: Complicity, the Holocaust, and Slavery in America" (2006), Naomi Mandel challenges the traditional concept of trauma as unspeakable, arguing that it serves as a "discursive production" that avoids moral responsibility in representing atrocities. Mandel suggests that silence and forgetting are strategic gestures by both the subjugated and subjugating cultures. Similarly, Ann Cvetkovich's "An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures" (2003) explores trauma beyond pathology, focusing on its specificities in butch-femme discourses and lesbian public cultures. She argues that trauma, including sexual trauma, lays the foundation for the formation of public cultures.

 

Greg Forter, in his work "Gender, Race, and Mourning in American Modernism" (2011), adapts the Freudian-Caruthian trauma model to distinguish between "punctual" trauma, a catastrophic event, and "non-punctual" trauma, an ongoing experience. He introduces the concept of "signification trauma," which allows for a transformative understanding of traumatic experiences. Forter's recent work applies this model to postcolonial novels, emphasizing the social, political, and cultural forces at play in representations of trauma. He argues that trauma's unrepresentable nature is not due to its being beyond history and representation but is instead a result of enforced ruptures with precolonial pasts and prohibitions against remembrance imposed by specific regimes of power.

 

The field of trauma studies continues to evolve, incorporating perspectives from postcolonialism, feminist theory, ethnic studies, and ecocriticism. Recent collections such as "Contemporary Approaches in Literary Trauma Theory" and "The Future of Trauma Theory" further explore the sociocultural and semiotic implications of trauma in literature. This breadth of criticism demonstrates the versatility and ongoing relevance of trauma studies to literary theory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ron Eyerman's "The Past in the Present Culture and the Transmission of Memory" (Summary)

 

Ron Eyerman’s article aims to introduce the concept of cultural trauma, focusing on its relevance to the experience of slavery and the development of African American identity. It explores the ideas of 'collective memory' and 'collective identity' in connection with a theory about intellectual generations. The argument suggests that the notion of being 'African American' emerged as a response by a group of black intellectuals who grappled with their exclusion from American society, despite promises of full integration after the Civil War (1861–1865). In this process, slavery was not merely an event but a powerful memory that played a central role.

 

Historical accounts have traditionally revolved around the belief that history is made up of lived stories, both individual and collective. Historians were seen as storytellers tasked with uncovering and retelling these narratives. The truth of these narratives was believed to lie in their alignment with the lived experiences of people in the past. However, as history evolved into a formal discipline, its connection with collective memory became more complex and constrained by scientific norms and evidential standards. Despite this, the narrative form and intention persisted, even with a heightened focus on factual documentation.

 

Hayden White offers a thoughtful exploration of the interplay between history and memory, seeking to reconcile their relationship by placing both within their respective temporal and socio-political contexts—essentially, within the broader scope of history.

 

Sociologists don't frequently delve into the realm of memory, and even less so into history. Here, Eyerman aims to depart from that tradition by emphasizing the significance of the past and collective memory in shaping identity. While this discussion is based on the research into the formation of African American identity within the framework of cultural trauma, the essay presenta a more general model centered on the concepts of cultural trauma, collective memory, and narrative.

 

Cultural trauma, provides a framework for understanding how collective identities develop in response to significant events. Unlike individual trauma, which involves personal emotional distress, cultural trauma refers to a profound loss of identity and meaning experienced by a cohesive group of people due to a major societal upheaval. This trauma doesn't necessarily affect every member of the group, nor do they all have to directly experience the traumatic event. However, it's crucial to establish the event's significance and recognize its traumatic impact. This process takes time and requires public reflection and discussion. In modern societies, media representations play a significant role in shaping collective understanding.

 

Neil Smelser defines cultural trauma as a memory that is acknowledged and accepted by a relevant group, recalling an event or situation loaded with negative emotions. It's seen as indelible and is believed to threaten the society's existence or challenge its core cultural beliefs. The key idea is that the formation of collective identity, closely tied to collective memory, can be rooted in experiences of loss and crisis, as well as moments of triumph. In fact, one way groups cope with loss is by attempting to transform tragedy into a narrative of triumph. This is a recurring theme in studies of cultural trauma, particularly in contexts like that of African Americans who have historically occupied a marginalized or subordinate position in society.

 

Sociologists don't often focus on memory, and when they do, it's sometimes viewed negatively as mere nostalgia. In modern times, there's a strong emphasis on looking forward to the future, rather than dwelling on the past. This idea is a core part of modernity and a key theme in classical sociological thinking. The aim is to break free from the constraints of history. Marx, for instance, pointed out how the weight of past events can heavily influence the present.

 

However, memory is essential for understanding society and how people interact within it. It serves as a mental map that helps individuals and groups navigate who they are, why they exist, and where they're headed. Memory is a crucial part of both personal and collective identity.

 

Usually, memory is thought of as something individual, residing within each person's mind. Theories about how people form their identities and develop socially tend to see memory as part of this process. Some models of collective identity, such as those in the collective behavior school, suggest that a "loss of self" occurs, freeing individuals from the constraints of memory, allowing new collective identities to emerge on their own.

 

In contrast, the Durkheimian tradition in social thought sees collective memory as vital for maintaining and perpetuating society. This view emphasizes collective events, rituals, and ceremonies that help uphold social cohesion. This perspective, as articulated by Paul Connerton, defines collective memory as shared recollections of the past passed down through ongoing acts of commemoration. These official rituals serve to remember a group's common heritage, with a shared history being a central component. These practices involve both physical and emotional elements, as the past is embodied and remembered through cultural customs.

 

In this view, individual memory is seen as stemming from collective memory. It's the collective memory that guides a group, providing the temporal and mental framework mentioned earlier. Collective memory brings a group together across time and space by offering a narrative framework, a shared story that situates individuals and their life stories within it. Because this narrative can be represented in various forms like text, art, or communication, it can be transported and shared widely.

 

This connection between collective memory and the formation of collective identity aligns with concepts of myth and ideology. Susan Sontag, in her discussion about the role of photography in representing pain, argues that there's no true "collective memory" in the strictest sense. Instead, what's often referred to as collective memory is more of a collective agreement on what's important and the story of how it happened. Images play a significant role in solidifying this story in our minds, serving as archives that support common ideas and evoke predictable thoughts and feelings. This distinction helps clarify the boundaries between the disciplines of history and collective memory.

 Slavery holds significant cultural importance and serves as a key memory in the shaping of African American identity. Successive generations of African American intellectuals have reflected on and reinterpreted its meaning, contributing to the collective narrative. After the American Civil War ended in 1865, there was hope for freedom and full citizenship for black Americans. However, as time passed, a new notion of "white-ness" emerged, leading to a reevaluation of the past, particularly the memory of slavery.

 

The first generation of black intellectuals arose in the 1890s, following the disappointment of the Reconstruction era and the reestablishment of segregation through practices like "Jim Crow." This led to a cultural trauma, prompting a reexamination of the past. The intellectuals, including figures like Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Boi, played a significant role in this process.

 

Washington and Du Bois believed that cultural politics was crucial for gaining acceptance in American society, especially when traditional politics was not accessible to them. They emphasized the unique opportunities that slavery presented for black Americans, framing it as a stepping stone to racial progress. This perspective laid the groundwork for a progressive narrative that influenced the second generation.

 

In addition to these intellectuals, popular culture played a vital role in shaping the consciousness of this generation. Former slaves' narratives gained popularity, as did black-faced minstrel shows and the emergence of black novelists, poets, and folk music like the blues. These forms of expression transmitted the memory of slavery across generations.

 

The conditions and events that were formative for the second generation included black Americans' participation in World War I and the resulting demographic shifts. The Great Migration saw millions of black Americans move from rural areas to urban centers, fundamentally changing perceptions of their experiences. This period also saw the rise of mass media beyond print, with radio, film, and the recording industry playing significant roles.

 

The third generation was shaped by the Second World War, another wave of the Great Migration, and post-war prosperity. The progressive narrative gained prominence, framing the terms of representation. This narrative gave rise to the civil rights movement, led by figures like Martin Luther King, Jr., who emphasized inclusion through good works and religious themes.

 

As the civil rights movement progressed, a modernized form of Black nationalism emerged, influenced by new visions of Africa and anti-colonial movements. This revitalized the redemptive narrative, which competed with the progressive narrative for support among African Americans. The mass media, particularly television, played a crucial role in shaping public perceptions.

 

Ultimately, the civil rights movement saw a convergence and reconciliation of these two narrative frames. This history has been institutionalized in Black Studies programs at colleges and universities across the United States.

 

To conclude, in this study, Eyerman aimed to develop a theory of cultural trauma centered around the significance of slavery in shaping African American identity. While focusing on representation, it is crucial to acknowledge the real suffering and costs associated with this historical experience. He links the formation of collective identity with collective memory, viewing memory as a meaningful practice that underpins group identity. The term 'African American' emerged as a response to the collective rejection faced by black individuals by American society after the Civil War. Slavery, viewed not just as an experience but as a remembered concept, played a central role in this process. As the dominant white society reinterpreted the Civil War, pushing slavery and former slaves to the margins, a crisis of identity emerged for marginalized groups. This led to the proposal of the term 'African American' and the concept of a 'New Negro' shortly after. Successive generations of African Americans collectively shaped their identities in relation to the dominant society, with slavery as a backdrop.

 

This process took place in various domains, including politics through organizations like the NAACP, as well as through social movements and cultural struggles for representation and recognition. Throughout these arenas, the past always remained a significant factor.

 

The issue of how well the narratives align with actual experiences remains a topic for further exploration. It's akin to the challenge of established frameworks not fitting new situations, a concept often discussed in sociological studies of science or ideologies. These frameworks serve as the foundation for collective thinking.

 

At a practical level, both narrative frames—progressive and redemptive—implied specific courses of action. The progressive narrative aimed for long-term social integration to overcome marginalization, while the redemptive narrative, championed by figures like Malcolm X, advocated for withdrawal and separation.

 

On another level, the concept of narrative directly relates to personal experience. For instance, in discussions about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, narratives of memory are seen as a means to attain a more truthful understanding of apartheid. These narratives connect directly with experience and encourage critical reflection, offering an alternative perspective to established discourses of power.

 

In essence, narratives are accounts of events that structure them within a meaningful framework. They carry a truth-claim, which can be subject to challenge, as different frames of interpretation may lead to varying conclusions about the same set of facts. This usage of narrative encompasses both everyday understanding and broader theoretical frameworks, aiming to capture the evolution of understanding that guides social practices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Looking at things from this viewpoint, the past serves as a shared reference point that shapes the collective identity of a group, even if not everyone experienced it firsthand. This understanding of the past is brought to life through symbolic interactions, storytelling, and discussions. Memory itself is influenced by these interactions and is used to validate and construct identity.

 

While physical objects, urban layouts, and museum displays can embody elements of the past, the meaning of the past is conveyed, understood, and passed down through language and conversation. These conversations take the form of stories, narratives that organize how they're told and impact how they're received. All communities and nations have foundational stories that explain who they are by recounting their origins. These narratives serve as core frameworks and are transmitted through traditions, rituals, ceremonies, and public events that reconnect the group and confirm membership. In this process, "we" are remembered, and "they" may be excluded.

 

These foundational narratives can be likened to discourse in the sense explored by Foucault, especially as outlined in his work "The Archaeology of Knowledge." While Foucault's discourses impose order from above and from outside through established knowledge, narratives are less rigid and more adaptable. Discourses dictate how texts should be interpreted, producing the meaning they convey; this links discourse to established power and, consequently, to ideology. Discourses, in this sense, unify and legitimize a diverse set of practices, creating a "system of relations." Even in fields like literature or popular culture, discourses can silently influence what gets published, read, and discussed.

 

Both narrative and discourse serve as framing structures that include and exclude, give voice and impose silence, shaping what can be seen and said, and by whom. Unlike Foucault's notion of discourse, collective narratives leave more room for individual agency while still providing a framework for individual stories to gain broader significance. While discourses involve power dynamics and empower those in the right positions, narratives can offer a platform for a "counter-story" from a minority or oppressed group, where some central concepts of a dominant discourse can be adopted and reinterpreted. For example, the concept of "race" was taken up and redefined by African Americans in their struggle to redefine their status in society. However, even within this process, more powerful representatives of a marginalized group can still exert a discursive influence in determining how their groups should be represented.

 

In many cases, founding narratives revolve around a significant and often traumatic event from which the collective identity of a group is said to have emerged. While these narratives share similarities with myths, they typically lack the all-encompassing and ontological scope usually associated with myths. However, regardless of their nature, these narratives are emotionally impactful. Founding narratives are about not only establishing a collective identity but also creating an "imagined" community. While this process is often studied in the context of nation-states and nation-building, it has been applied in studies of social movements and, more recently, in the examination of ethnic minority groups like black Americans, where a generational perspective complements the concepts of cultural trauma, collective memory, and narrative.

 

Cultural trauma draws attention to how we collectively remember events and the role of representation. There's also a power dynamic at play, with political leaders and mass media influencing which events get represented, impacting what gets remembered or forgotten. In the case of major events like civil wars, understanding and interpreting them may take time and distance. When there are winners and losers, the losing side might struggle to have their perspective heard, and it could take years, even generations, for them to share their side of the story.

 

In a study of how Spain remembers the Spanish Civil War, Igartua and Paez (1997) highlight four key factors in how memory changes over generations:

 

The need for enough time to pass for people to emotionally distance themselves from the traumatic event, whether it's a personal or a collective experience.

 

The requirement of social resources to support activities that commemorate and remember the event.

 

The natural aging of individuals involved, leading to selective remembering and forgetting.

 

The impact of this aging process on socio-political repression.