In his collected essays, "Welcome to the
Jungle," Mercer articulates the nuances of what some of the "new
positions" in black cultural studies might convey. Mercer adopts an
unsentimental approach to social categories such as race, class, sexuality, and
gender. Rather than dismissing their importance, he seeks to move beyond the
confines of identity politics. Mercer advocates for a shift towards the more
ambivalent and ambiguous terrain of multiple points of identification. Drawing
a crucial distinction between identity and identification, he emphasizes the
latter as a means to understand how political actions and practices are not
rigidly tied to specific identities. Mercer challenges the assumption that a
black body is inherently the locus of anti-racist politics, or that female
bodies inherently represent feminism, and similarly, the gay body queer
politics. He highlights that political identifications can traverse social
categories, making it impossible to predict an individual's politics based
solely on their identity.
"Welcome to the Jungle" poses probing questions
about black cultural politics, centering its primary focus on issues of
hybridity and creolization. Mercer engages both within and in opposition to
cultural studies, particularly in essays like "Welcome to the Jungle:
Identity and Diversity in Postmodern Politics" and "'1968':
Periodizing Politics and Identity." He advocates for an understanding of
identity as continuously unstable, and it is within this context of identity
instability that he subjects political strategies and actions to scrutiny
through the lens of representational practices.
Representational strategies and practices play a crucial
role in highlighting the political significance of identity, providing artists,
writers, filmmakers, and others with avenues to foster diverse and multiple
identifications, transcending the constraints of social bodies. Mercer's work
robustly challenges the essentialisms inherent in identity politics while
remaining mindful of the historical importance of identity-based movements like
the American civil rights movement, feminism, gay and lesbian liberation, and
British anti-racism. Despite recognizing the contributions of these movements,
Mercer calls for a broader political vision, particularly in the contemporary
postmodern moment marked by the erosion of liberatory and emancipatory
narratives.
Within the realm of art, especially in photography, fine
art, and film, Mercer makes a compelling case for delving into the politics of
identity and identifications. In his essay "Black Art and the Burden of
Representation," he contends that the scarcity of spaces for black
artists, writers, and filmmakers to exhibit their work places an undue burden
on each piece and artist to represent and speak on behalf of the Black
community. Mercer challenges the notion that black artists, appearing one at a
time in the public eye, should bear the responsibility of representing an
entire community. Instead, he advocates for a more nuanced approach in cultural
politics, rejecting the tendency to view these artists as mere representatives
and emphasizing the need for a complex critique. This more intricate approach
involves not condemning artists for perceived failures in representing a
specific imagined community but encouraging critiques that facilitate the
proliferation of various representations of diverse imagined communities.
Mercer acknowledges the dual nature of the issue:
firstly, the conservatism of a particular artist may raise questions about the
political messages conveyed by their work. However, the second criterion
becomes crucial—creating a space for the proliferation of other works with
different narratives, enriching the cultural landscape of representations.
Mercer's insightful analysis of Isaac Julien's films underscores their
disruption of heteronormative assertions of blackness, introducing diverse
perspectives into cultural artifacts and practices.
In his essays on black masculinities, particularly those
examining Robert Mapplethorpe's work, Mercer offers illuminating insights. In
"Imagining the Black Man’s Sex," he critiques Mapplethorpe's
photographs of black male sexuality, highlighting the objectification of
various stereotypes. Mercer questions the central focus on the penis and the headless
black models. However, in a bold re-reading in "Skin Head Sex Thing:
Racial Difference and the Homoerotic Imaginary," Mercer reconsiders his
earlier analysis, exploring his own homoerotic response to the photographs.
Through a complex and shifting analysis, he establishes an ambivalent
relationship with the images, suggesting that seeing the black male nudes as
the beginning of a subversive deconstruction opens up new possibilities.
Mercer's ability to recognize the polyvocal quality of Mapplethorpe's work allows
him to revise his position, accounting for biographical and autobiographical
dimensions without resorting to a simplistic experiential mode.
Mercer challenges simplistic politics of experience and
commonality in his essays, emphasizing the urgency of constituting a politics
of liberation and emancipation amidst the collapse of such narratives. He
avoids easy universalist statements about transnational blackness, arguing for
dialogism that acknowledges the plural and heterogeneous nature of black identities.
Mercer contends that critical dialogism questions the monologic exclusivity
underlying dominant versions of national identity, emphasizing the potential
for diasporic black peoples to make identifications across borders while
remaining mindful of the ways in which the local organizes experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment