The examination of nationalism
during decolonization has generated diverse viewpoints, leading to
disagreements about its role and dynamics. Political nationalism challenges the
idea of 'colonial difference' externally, while cultural nationalism seeks to
preserve it internally in a reformed manner. This complex interplay continues
to have significant consequences for Africa today.
Benedict Anderson's work,
'Imagined Communities,' contributes to our understanding of the origin and
global spread of nationalism. He suggests that the emergence of anti-colonial
nationalisms is influenced by native 'bilingual intelligentsias.' These
individuals, exposed to "modern Western culture in the broadest
sense," played a crucial role in the rise of anti-colonial nationalism. By
speaking the language of colonial rulers and having experienced life in Europe
or North America, they used their knowledge to shape a nationalist
consciousness when denied power by colonial regimes.
However, critics challenge
Anderson's account, arguing that it diminishes the agency of the colonized
world. Loomba contends that accepting Anderson's explanation implies that
"anti-colonial nationalism is itself made possible and shaped by European
political and intellectual history". This reduces it to a 'derivative
discourse' relying on models and language borrowed from colonial powers. The
Subaltern Studies collective, especially Chatterjee, questions what is left for
nationalisms worldwide if they have to choose from predefined forms provided by
Europe and the Americas. Chatterjee emphasizes that these regions not only
shaped "colonial enlightenment and exploitation" but also
"anti-colonial resistance and post-colonial misery," highlighting the
enduring colonization of imaginations.
In the cultural realm,
nationalism shapes a modern project that isn't Western. Chatterjee argues that
this is where the nation, as an imagined community, comes into existence.
Anti-colonial nationalism often asserted control over language, religion, art,
education, and popular culture, asserting sovereignty in Asia and Africa.
Nigerian cultural nationalism in literature and filmmaking emphasized
indigenous elements, proposing alternative representational paradigms. In this
internal realm, anti-colonial nationalisms aimed to maintain reshaped notions
of 'difference' to resist modern disciplinary power structures.
Externally, where nationalism
is a political movement, efforts are made to eliminate the imprints of colonial
difference. The colonial state's authority relied on maintaining the otherness
of the ruling group, legitimizing actions by affirming their superiority.
Colonial difference took various forms, with race often determining eligibility
for governance and civil society participation. Language, too, occasionally
restricted freedom of speech. South Africa is an example where colonial
differences were stark. Anti-colonial nationalism aimed to challenge these
differences by highlighting the incongruity between colonial rule conditions
and the modern regimes sought by colonialists.
Colonial rulers justified
their actions by incorporating social regulations to discipline individuals,
claiming it made power more effective and humane. Anti-colonial nationalists
agreed with this idea but argued that colonial rule went against the true principles
of modern governance. For example, Nelson Mandela and the ANC in South Africa
asserted their rights by referring to the norms of enlightened modern states.
Similarly, in Algeria, nationalist leader Emir Khalid highlighted the conflict
between French colonial policies and the modern regime of power it aimed to
promote. He used assimilationist rhetoric against the colonial system,
demanding equal rights for Muslims. This approach reflects the nationalist
hegemony project, aiming to establish and expand modern forms of disciplinary
power. In many ways, post-colonial states formed through nationalism have
adopted the ideas and practices of colonialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment