Rajeswar Rajan's comprehensive exploration of gender,
culture, and postcolonialism is illuminated through the lens of cultural
representations surrounding contentious traditions in Indian culture. These
include the self-immolation of Hindu widows (sati), husband worship,
bride-burning, and dowry deaths. Rajan's analysis of specific texts and films
is positioned within a nuanced intervention in contemporary feminist
postcolonial debates on female subjectivity, the construction of tradition in
minority cultures, and interpretations of resistance and agency in women's
texts and broader social contexts.
The study posits that postcolonial cultures share common
features such as feminist negotiations with the postcolonial state, social
structural inequalities, the influence of nationalism and regionalism, and the
tension between tradition and modernity. Simultaneously, postcolonial
identities are diverse, challenging arguments for essential indigenous
identities and the re-appropriation of colonial subjects by theory.
Rajan draws on selected texts and films to illustrate
that representation holds its own political reality and consequences. The study
contends that culture itself is both coercive and contested, and subjectivities
are continually reinscribed in the cultural realm.
Navigating these topics requires delicacy to avoid
sensationalism and ethical imperatives. The study resists reducing women's
experiences to a "real" pain versus discursive constructions of
female subjectivity. It timely and informatively addresses social debasement,
considering various religious and cultural traditions underpinning practices
like sati.
Sati, with its problematic attribution of motive,
voluntary immolation claims, and lack of testimonies, invites debates on forms
of subordination and ritual intricacies. The complexity of this topic is
embedded in cultural reticence, psychological compensations, excuses, and
ambiguity. Disturbingly, despite its official abolition in 1829, there were
4,386 "wife-murders" in 1990, indicating a tangled web of cultural
pressure, ingrained practices, and self-serving male actions between these two
time points.
Despite Rajan's meticulous analysis of her selected
texts, a deeper exploration of the material aspects of the practices would have
added valuable insights. The study touches upon widows, women, husbands, and
relatives, but there's a need for more exploration into circumstances leading
to death by burning beyond widowhood. Questions arise about the specific rites
preceding and accompanying these practices, the role of economic
pressures—exemplified by modern cases of daughters' suicides due to dowry
concerns—and the origins of the fervor for husband worship.
It's intriguing to learn that Indian women can supposedly
shorten their husbands' lives simply by uttering their names, especially
considering that some only speak their husbands' names at the moment of their
deaths. However, the original sanctions for such extreme forms of subordination
seem to require further examination.
The study provides relief by acknowledging the staging of
the "cultural unconscious" in popular films, involving elaborate acts
of revenge against husbands and abuses of power. The exaggerated fantasies
described align with the magnification of husbands' rights. Rajan wisely avoids
emphasizing cultural differences and relativism but rather focuses on detailed
historical and textual study, highlighting the continuity with Western
traditions that feminists need to underscore.
The investigation might benefit from examining how
India's integration into the global economy, Western intervention, development
and aid practices, and the rural-urban divide may have encouraged practices
that replicate or imitate sati. The study offers examples supporting this
perspective.
Rajan extends earlier discussions of speech and silence
by introducing the concept of "action," a third term with
philosophical and political implications. This adds complexity to earlier
feminist assumptions, challenging the notion that giving women access to public
terrains and rescuing women's texts and voices from historical oblivion are the
sole tasks of feminist critics.
The missing term for women subjected to sati seems to be
"action," and the study raises important questions about measuring
the subjective force of centuries of cultural practice. Sati, taken up in
iconography, signifies repression, ambiguity, and cultural hybridity. It also
signifies a complex relationship between pleasure and pain that warrants
further questioning regarding the cultural continuation of women's ownership in
Indian culture. Economic contexts don't merely replace religious motivation;
they seem to over-determine forms of sati continuation in the modern world and
their self-justification.
Rajan's chapter on Indira Gandhi extends the debate on
the intersection of public power and private realms, challenging simplistic
interpretations of women political leaders as surrogate males or symbols of
motherhood. It questions gendered explanations of political authority and
delves into the paradoxical relationship between Gandhi as Mother India and her
declaration of emergency conditions. The discussion of allegories of power,
women under emergency conditions, and rural village infrastructures and
communities versus the pluralism of modern democracy invites comparisons with
African structures and conditions.
Rajan's study broadly emphasizes areas of intervention in
complex feminist and postcolonial debates, providing detailed readings of texts
and clear summaries of problematic areas while outlining a cultural
construction of female subjectivity that allows for contestation and agency.
The overall direction of her thesis suggests a view of women as
"conflicted subjects and sites of conflict" (135).
However, the general direction of the photographs and
historical occurrences cited seems to portray Indian wives as passive objects
of their husbands' and society's volition, creating a contradiction. This might
exemplify one of the problems she introduces in her discussion: is subversion
located within reading or writing practices? Iconography tends to lead us
towards static contemplation and aesthetic responses. Politics, the
non-essential essence of feminism, appears to require more than contemplation.
No comments:
Post a Comment