Eurocentric narratives attribute the origins of the
cosmopolitan concept to figures like Diogenes and later associate it with
thinkers such as the Stoics, Pauline Christianity, and Enlightenment
philosopher Immanuel Kant. The central idea is that all humans belong to a
single community, prioritizing individual beings over the state or specific
human associations. However, critics argue that Kant's views had limitations,
excluding certain groups from his moral considerations based on racial
hierarchies.
It's important to note that cosmopolitanism is not
exclusively a Western idea; it is a global concept. The desire for
cosmopolitanism doesn't originate from a single knowledge source but is present
in various traditions worldwide. Diverse ancient works from Egyptians, Hebrews,
Chinese, Ethiopians, Assyrians, and Persians, among others, contribute to the
rich legacy of cosmopolitan thought. This perspective challenges the
Western-centric view and emphasizes the diverse epistemologies, ontologies,
methodologies, and imaginaries that have shaped cosmopolitanism globally.
In history, besides Diogenes, Buddhism also advocated for
human connectedness, as discussed by Ward in 2013. Dharwadker notes that
Buddha's cosmopolitan perspective, emphasizing an inclusive idea of humanity
and interconnectedness, prefigures the Greek formulation of cosmopolitanism.
Rabindranath Tagore, in the early 20th century, challenged blind allegiance to
nationalism, advocating for a unified world (Tagore 2008; Rao 2012; Bose 2006).
Desmond Tutu, drawing from the African Ubuntu tradition,
echoes a similar sentiment, emphasizing interdependence and stating that our
humanity is intertwined. Ngcoya explains that this perspective encourages
ethical relationships based on reciprocity, hospitality, and recognition of our
interconnectedness, a person is a person through others.
Confucianism, a tradition rooted in China, also promotes the
connectedness of humanity and our responsibility to others. The ethical concern
for "all under Heaven" in Confucianism extends to a responsibility
for everything under heaven. The concept of the "unity of Heaven and
man" rejects any opposition between humanity and nature, emphasizing
harmony. Lastly, the idea that personal development should contribute to
society aligns with cosmopolitan themes (Young and Sang 2014).
Walter Mignolo's work delves into understanding our current
state by exploring consciousness across time and space. Throughout his
extensive career, he has aimed to create a space for various anti-colonial,
post-colonial, and de-colonial ways of thinking to coexist and connect. Mignolo
is interested in uncovering new perspectives for the future.
One concept he introduces is "border thinking," where
the potential for change lies at the intellectual and existential border
between marginalized perspectives and modernity. This border thinking serves as
a tool for critical cosmopolitanism, envisioning a future characterized by a
global understanding that embraces diverse ways of knowing. Mignolo emphasizes
moving away from a universal ideology and, instead, encourages acceptance of
different ways of existence. He cautions against imposing a single viewpoint or
blueprint for an ideal society, as this could inadvertently perpetuate
Eurocentric paradigms. Instead, Mignolo promotes reflexivity, urging
individuals to consider their own standpoint and, more importantly, understand
the perspectives of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment