Toni Morrison advocates for the
extension of American literature study to a wider landscape, drawing a critical
geography that allows for discovery, intellectual adventure, and close
exploration. They believe that as an African-American woman writer, she must
think about how free she can be in her genderized, sexualized, wholly
racialized world. To think about the full implications of her situation, she
considers what happens when other writers work in a highly and historically
racialized society.
Morison questions the conventional wisdom that traditional American literature
is free of, informed, and unshaped by the presence of Africans and
African-Americans in the United States. She believes that the contemplation of
this black presence is central to any understanding of our national literature
and should not be allowed to hover at the margins of the literary imagination.
Morrison queries whether the major characteristics of American literature, such
as individualism, masculinity, social engagement, moral problematics, and
thematics of innocence, are actually responses to a dark Africanist presence.
The formation of the nation necessitated coded language and purposeful
restriction to deal with the racial disingenuousness and moral frailty at its
heart. The literature reproduced the necessity for codes and restriction
through significant omissions, contradictions, and heavily nuanced conflicts.
Morrison’s curiosity about the ways in which a nonwhite, Africanlike (or
Africanist) presence or persona was constructed in the United States has become
an informal study of what is called American Africanism. This term refers to
the denotative and connotative blackness that African peoples have come to
signify, as well as the entire range of views, assumptions, readings, and misreadings
that accompany Eurocentric learning about these people.
The focus of African-American studies should not be on a shift in hierarchy but
rather on understanding what makes intellectual domination possible and how
knowledge is transformed from invasion and conquest to revelation and choice.
Examining the nature and cause of literary "whiteness" through a
close look at literary "blackness" could provide access to a deeper
reading of American literature, potentially revealing the role of whiteness in
the construction of what is loosely described as "American."
The literature on the presence and influence of Africanist peoples in American
criticism has been largely overlooked due to the tendency to define racialism
in terms of its consequences on the victim rather than its impact on the object
of racist policy and attitudes. It is crucial to examine the impact of racism
on those who perpetuate it, including examining the impact of notions of racial
hierarchy, racial exclusion, and racial vulnerability and availability on
nonblacks who held, explored, or altered those notions.
Historians, social scientists, anthropologists, psychiatrists, and some
students of comparative literature have approached these areas, but urgently
needed attention should be paid to the literature of the western country with
one of the most resilient Africanist populations in the world. A criticism that
insists that literature is not only "universal" but also
"race-free" risks lobotomizing that literature and diminishing both
the art and the artist. As an African-American and writer, I stand to benefit
from this line of questioning, as there is no escape from racially inflected
language in a wholly racialized society.
Some powerful literary critics in the United States have never read any
African-American text, which seems to have done them no harm and presented them
with no discernible limitations in the scope of their work or influence. There
is a centuries-long, hysterical blindness to feminist discourse and the way in
which women and women's issues were read or unread. National literatures and
writers often describe and inscribe what is really on the national mind, with
the architecture of a new white man as its focus. However, the authors
themselves are among the most sensitive, intellectually anarchic,
representative, and probing artists.
2
Morrison’s early assumptions as a reader were that black people signified
little or nothing in the imagination of white American writers. However, the
author stopped reading as a reader and began to read as a writer, realizing
that the subject of the dream is the dreamer, and the fabrication of an
Africanist persona is reflexive, an extraordinary meditation on the self, and a
powerful exploration of the fears and desires that reside in the writerly
conscious.
National literatures and writers play a crucial role in shaping the nation's
consciousness and understanding of the African American experience. By
examining the ways in which Africanist personae, narratives, and idioms are
used and represented, we can better understand the complex relationship between
fiction and reality.
The novel "Sapphira and the Slave Girl" is a classic fugitive slave
narrative that emphasizes Nancy's fugitive state within the household before
her escape. The real fugitive, the text asserts, is the slave mistress. The
plot escapes the author's control and points to the hopelessness of excising
racial considerations from formulations of white identity.
Nancy's existence on the Colbert farm is central to the story, as she is forced
to hide her emotions, thoughts, and body from pursuers. Unable to please
Sapphira, she is also barred from help, instruction, or consolation from her
own mother, Till. Cather acknowledges and banishes this wholly unanalyzed
mother-daughter relationship by inserting a furtive exchange between Till and
Rachel
The dialogue surrounding the story revolves around the silence of four hundred
years, reflecting historical discourse on slave parent-child relationships and
pain. The protagonist, Sapphira, is committed to escape from the possibility of
developing her adult personality and sensibilities, as well as her femaleness,
motherhood, community of women, and body. She resides on Nancy, a young,
healthy, and sexually appetizing Africanist girl, who has transferred its care
into the hands of others. This allows her to escape illness, decay,
confinement, anonymity, and physical powerlessness.
The novel serves as a fugitive, designed to meditate on the moral equivalence
of free white women and enslaved black women. The author's imaginative strategy
is difficult and impossible, but she allows the novel to escape from fiction
into nonfiction. For narrative credibility, Cather substitutes her own
determination to force the equation outside the narrative.
At the end of the novel, it turns into a kind of memoir, as the author's
recollection of herself as a child witnessing the return, reconciliation, and
imposed "all rightness" in untenable, outrageous circumstances is
muzzled in the epilogue. The shape and detail of their lives are hers, not
theirs. Cather feels obliged to give the Africanist mother and daughter center
stage, even though they make claims and impose demands of imaginative
accountability over and above the author's will to contain them.
In returning to her childhood, Cather returns to a very personal and private
experience, working out and toward the meaning of female betrayal as she faces
the void of racism. She may not have arrived safely, like Nancy, but to her
credit, she did undertake the dangerous journey.
No comments:
Post a Comment