Saturday 25 November 2023

Leonard J Davis' "Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism & Other Difficult Positions" (Book Note)


 

"Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions" comprises nine distinct essays, providing a comprehensive exploration of the author-activist's evolving thoughts on disability, disability studies, and literary historical criticism. The collection spans diverse topics, including the human genome project, ADA court cases, concepts of citizenship, the history of the novel, homosexuality, postmodernist theory, the rise of Disability Studies, and more. As part of NYU's Cultural Fronts series, which aims to highlight works of cultural criticism with policy implications, the book is not exclusively intended for historians but offers creative and challenging insights that can benefit the field, particularly disability historians.

 

Central to Davis's argument is the transformative potential of disability as a category of identity, challenging postmodern notions of identity. Rooted in his earlier works, such as "Enforcing Normalcy" and "The Disability Studies Reader," Davis delves into the social, scientific, and linguistic processes shaping the meaning of "disability." His personal reflections in works like "Shall I Say a Kiss" and "My Sense of Silence" provide poignant images of living as/with Deaf individuals, combining theoretical frameworks from Jacques Lacan and Michel Foucau with personal narratives.

 

While the book primarily compiles previously published pieces, reflecting Davis's internal dialogues since their release, it highlights a substantial evolution in understanding. Davis emphasizes the omnipresence of disability, urging scholars to consider its potential for reshaping academic and practical definitions of identity and status.

 

Several chapters revisit arguments from Davis's earlier works, notably the assertion that the nineteenth century marked a shift from ideals to norms, exemplified by the rise of eugenics. The book extends these ideas, linking disability to legal systems, American politics, the environment, technology, and the economy. Davis introduces "dismodernism" as an alternative to identity politics and social constructionism, proposing that disability transcends and supplants traditional postmodernist classifiers of race, class, and gender. Davis contends that disability's fluidity as a category allows Disability Studies to offer a broad critique of contemporary systems of oppression.

 

The introduction, "People with Disability: They Are You," goes beyond typical disability theory scholarship, asserting that disability directly and indirectly influences everyone. Davis advocates for a broader civil rights mandate through dismodernism, aligning protections across all classes. He contends that impairment is the rule, normalcy is a fantasy, and universal design should guide social and political structures.

 

Chapters of particular interest to disability historians include "The End of Identity Politics and the Beginning of Dismodernism," which explores parallels between historical expressions of minority identities, and "Bending over Backwards," providing a detailed analysis of the Americans with Disabilities Act and specific ADA court cases. The latter chapter delves into legal texts, emphasizing the framing of cultural norms within documents and judicial decisions.

 

Davis's attention to economic factors compounding disability experiences is appreciated, shedding light on the intricate ties between class circumstances and disability. Examples illustrate the prevalence of genetic testing in affluent societies and the socioeconomic challenges faced by people with disabilities.

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment