In "Mestizaje: Critical Uses of Race in Chicano
Culture," Pérez-Torres explores the concept of race mixture among
Chicanos, asserting the significance of a Chicano mestizo voice. He argues that
in the Latino New World, bodies of racially mixed individuals symbolize sites
embodying awareness of social inequity and the resulting contradictions.
Pérez-Torres contends that Chicano popular art, literature, and expressive
culture prominently feature the theme of race mixture or 'mestizaje,' driving
cultural production. The focus spans Chicano popular music, poster art, and
literature, emphasizing the role of mestizo voices in challenging the dominant
US social order.
Pérez-Torres's understanding of mestizaje extends beyond
biological notions of race-mixture to encompass social and cultural phenomena
like 'transculturation' and 'hybridity.' Positioned within cultural criticism's
exploration of contact zones and borderlands, his use of the term 'mestizaje'
with explicit racial connotations stands out. This choice contrasts with Nestór
García Canclini's preference for 'hybridization,' reflecting a broader
perspective beyond biological race and a rejection of the nationalist narrative
tied to the term 'mestizaje' in the Mexican context.
Pérez-Torres embraces 'mestizaje' for Chicanos due to its
explicit racial dimension, challenging mainstream US discourses that often
overlook Chicano experiences of racialization. He asserts the centrality of
race as a critical intervention in Chicano criticism, which tends to focus on
borderlands, violence, and bilingualism. Pérez-Torres sees the racial dimension
of a critical mestizo voice as crucial for revealing the asymmetrical race
relations in US society and empowering mestizas and mestizos to adopt new
subjectivities that address a history of racial conflict. Ultimately,
Pérez-Torres explores how cultural mestizaje embodies both utopian
possibilities of aggregation and the contradictions and tensions produced by
racial mixture, shaping the cultural expression of Chicano thought and
identity.
In each chapter of this book, Pérez-Torres presents a
cultural and political study in essay form, delving into various aspects of the
mestizo voice. The introduction and first chapter lay the foundation for his
concept of mestizaje, offering a detailed examination of academic and popular
perspectives on race mixture. Chapter 2 explores mestizo voice in diverse
texts, including the film Giant and the writings of Oscar 'Zeta' Acosta and
Sandra Cisneros. Chapter 3 delves into the musical realm, analyzing artists
like Los Lobos, Delinquent Habits, and Rage Against the Machine, who
consciously employ formal mestizaje by blending distinct sounds and musical
influences. Chapter 4 focuses on the role of Chicano public art, specifically
poster art, in shaping notions of mestizaje. Chapters 5 and 6 center on the
mestizo body as a site of knowledge, examining literary works by Emma Pérez,
Gil Cuadros, Gary Soto, Victor Martinez, and Pat Mora.
While Pérez-Torres's writing occasionally delves into
theoretical intricacies, his more compelling analyses emerge from close
readings of specific cultural and literary texts. Chapter 3, for instance,
provides a focused and concise analysis of three albums released in 1996 by Los
Angeles musicians, revealing a critical dialogue about Chicano and American
consciousness. Although the analysis leans toward celebrating a Chicano
masculine aesthetic, subsequent chapters explore mestizo and mestiza voices
that challenge normative assertions of Chicano identity, acknowledging the
diversity within this cultural landscape.
The study's primary strength lies in its detailed
exploration of mestizo and mestiza voices. However, this focus may result in a
limitation, as it overlooks a broader dialogue with other discourses on racial and
ethnic self-identification. Pérez-Torres acknowledges that his study aims to
trace how race mixture embodies awareness of social inequity and
contradictions. Nevertheless, his claims about mestizaje's liberatory potential
prompt consideration of engaging with the discursive silences and alternative
perspectives within the discourse. For instance, a comprehensive study of race
mixture for US Mexican origin peoples should address the common discursive
exclusion of African ancestry from the mixed racial heritage of Mexican and US
Mexican descent individuals. Additionally, while many identify as mestizos and
mestizas, others choose alternative racial/ethnic self-conceptualizations, such
as 'Latinos and Latinas,' 'Mexican-Americans,' 'Hispanics,' 'Spanish-Americans,'
'indigenous,' or 'bi-racial.' Engaging with these diverse voices is essential
for a nuanced understanding of Chicano perspectives on race and race mixture.
No comments:
Post a Comment