Gendering Orientalism
investigates the overtly orientalist paintings of French artist Henriette
Browne and the implicitly orientalist portrayal of Jews as the orientalized
Other in George Eliot's novel Daniel Deronda to trace the gendered agency of
these cultural producers and its contribution to the imperial project. Lewis
utilizes contemporary art criticism to examine the racialization of gender
discourses and the gendering of race discourses. She argues that the production
and interpretation of culture in nineteenth-century France and Britain were
shaped by the construction and exclusion of a racialized and orientalized
other. The complexities of women's imperial positionings in the second half of
the nineteenth century are unraveled, exploring their simultaneous positioning
within different experiences of imperialism, gender, class, and in relation to
discourses of creativity. In this context, 'race, femininity, and
representation' are interwoven constitutive elements in processes of both
affirmation and negation. Lewis contends that women's differentiated gendered
access to the positionalities of imperial discourse generated a gaze on the
Orient and orientalized 'other' that registered difference less categorically than
Edward Said's orientalism.
Chapters 1 and 2 serve as introductions, establishing the
groundwork for a critique of Said's orientalist thesis. Lewis draws on Gayatri
Chakravorty Spivak to emphasize the necessity of considering imperialism in
nineteenth-century Britain due to its role in constituting England to the
English. Chapters 3 and 4 focus on Henriette Browne and her depictions of nuns
and harems, with Chapter 3 exploring the gendered, generic, and national
aspects of Browne's work. Lewis argues that Browne's authorial persona was
constructed from responses to her major paintings, delineating a class-,
gender-, and nation-specific persona focusing on her representation of female
labor, sexuality, and space. Chapter 4, 'Only women should go to Turkey:
Henriette Browne and the female Orientalist gaze,' marks a departure from
Said's totalizing and masculinist thesis on Orientalism.
In Chapter 5, Lewis examines how her reformulations of the
orientalist gaze can reshape the analysis of George Eliot's representation of
racial difference in Daniel Deronda. Lewis demonstrates how Eliot's
anti-discriminatory project relies on an orientalist construction of the Jewish
other. Introducing Freud's concept of the 'uncanny,' Lewis discusses the
repulsion readers feel for the character Daniel as a Jew based on the
unpleasant confrontation with repressed elements of their own unconsciousness.
Jews in Daniel Deronda are presented as the uncanny, simultaneously
representing a projection of the self and something alien to the self. While
enjoyable, this chapter, with its cursory use of Freudian analysis, feels
somewhat appended at the end of the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment