At our previous congress thirteen years ago, I introduced
the concept of the mirror stage, which has since gained traction within the
French group's practice. Today, I believe it is pertinent to revisit this
concept, particularly for its insights into the formation of the self in
psychoanalysis. This experience challenges philosophies derived directly from
the Cogito.
The genesis of this concept stems from an observation in
comparative psychology. We noted that even at an age when a child might be
temporarily surpassed by a chimpanzee in instrumental intelligence, the child
can already recognize their own reflection in a mirror. This recognition
manifests in the captivating mimicry of what Köhler terms the Aha-Erlebnis,
representing a crucial stage of situational apperception within the act of
intelligence.
Unlike in the case of a monkey, where the act might
conclude upon mastering the image, in children, it initiates a series of
gestures. Through play, the child explores the relationship between their movements
reflected in the mirror and the surrounding reality, including their own body
and the people and objects nearby. This phenomenon, documented as early as six
months by Baldwin, captivates me, especially witnessing infants engage with
mirrors.
Even though these infants cannot yet walk or stand
unaided, their jubilant activity in front of the mirror unveils a libidinal
dynamism and an ontological structure of the human world that resonates with my
reflections on paranoid knowledge. This activity holds significance for me
until around eighteen months of age, revealing a symbolic matrix in which the
ego assumes a primordial form—the Ideal-I—before undergoing further
objectification through identification with others and linguistic development.
Understanding the mirror stage as a profound
identification process sheds light on the transformation that occurs within the
subject as they embrace their image—an imago—in a manner consistent with
psychoanalytic theory. This joyous assumption of their specular image by the
infant, amidst their motor incapacity and dependence, epitomizes the
foundational formation of the ego, preceding its social determinations. This
Ideal-I formulates the groundwork for subsequent identifications, including
libidinal normalization, while also situating the ego's agency in a fictional
trajectory that remains uniquely individualistic, resisting complete
assimilation into societal constructs.
The concept of the mirror stage illuminates how a subject
anticipates the maturation of their power through the total form of the body,
grasped as a Gestalt—a structured whole that contrasts with the subject's
internal sense of movement. This Gestalt symbolizes both the enduring nature of
the self and its potential alienation, echoing our projections onto statues,
phantoms, and even automatons.
Mirrors serve as a threshold to the visible world for our
imagos, shaping hallucinations, dreams, and manifestations of the double.
Biological experiments with pigeons and locusts highlight the formative influence
of images on organisms, suggesting a homeomorphic identification related to
notions of beauty.
Mimicry, whether homomorphic or heteromorphic, raises
questions about the significance of space for living organisms, inviting
psychological analysis beyond mere adaptation. This spatial captation, evident
in the mirror stage, hints at an organic insufficiency in human reality,
compounded by an innate discordance and prematurity in human birth.
The mirror stage functions as a mechanism for
establishing a relation between the organism and its reality, reflecting a
primal Discord within the human organism. Embryological concepts like
foetalization underscore the early development of the cortical system, which
acts as an intra-organic mirror.
This developmental process unfolds as a temporal
dialectic, propelling the individual's formation into history. From fragmented
body-image to orthopaedic totality and ultimately to the assumption of an
alienating identity, the mirror stage shapes the subject's mental development,
perpetuating the quest for validation in the external world.
The fragmented body, a term I've incorporated into our
theoretical framework, often emerges in dreams when the individual faces
aggressive disintegration. It presents as disjointed limbs or organs taking on
surreal forms, akin to Hieronymus Bosch's visionary paintings. This
fragmentation is palpably evident in the anatomical lines of phantasy, seen in
the schizoid and spasmodic symptoms of hysteria.
2
Conversely, the formation of the ego is depicted in
dreams as a fortress or stadium, with inner arenas surrounded by marshes and
rubbish heaps, symbolizing internal struggles. On the mental plane, we
encounter fortified structures akin to obsessional neurosis mechanisms, such as
inversion, isolation, and displacement.
However, solely relying on subjective observations leaves
our theoretical endeavors vulnerable to projecting into the realm of an
absolute subject. Therefore, I've sought a method of symbolic reduction
grounded in objective data, establishing a genetic order within the ego's
defenses.
This framework positions hysterical repression at a more
archaic stage than obsessional inversion, which precedes paranoic alienation
stemming from the deflection of the specular ego into the social ego. The
transition from the mirror stage marks the commencement of a dialectic linking
the ego to socially constructed scenarios, propelled by the drama of primordial
jealousy and identification with the counterpart.
This pivotal moment mediates human knowledge through the
desire of others, abstractly equating objects through social cooperation. The
ego becomes an apparatus wherein every instinctual impulse poses a threat,
necessitating cultural mediation for maturation, exemplified in the Oedipus complex.
In this context, the term "primary narcissism"
unveils profound semantic nuances, elucidating the dynamic interplay between
narcissistic libido and sexual libido. Early analysts invoked destructive
instincts to explain the link between narcissistic libido and the alienating
function of the ego, manifesting as aggressivity even in ostensibly altruistic
interactions.
The contemporary philosophy of being and nothingness
acknowledges existential negativity, but it confines this negativity within the
bounds of consciousness's self-sufficiency, perpetuating the illusion of
autonomy linked to ego méconnaissances. Despite drawing heavily from
psychoanalytic experience, this philosophy falls short in providing a
comprehensive existential psychoanalysis.
Existentialism emerges at a historical juncture where
society predominantly emphasizes utilitarian functions, leading individuals to
grapple with anxieties stemming from a concentrated form of social bondage.
However, its explanations for subjective impasses fail to align with our
experiential realities. The freedom it champions often manifests within the
confines of confinement, commitment expresses the impotence of pure
consciousness, and its treatment of sexual relations veers toward voyeuristic
and sadistic idealizations.
Contrary to existentialist propositions, our
psychoanalytic experience reveals that the ego isn't solely centered on
perception-consciousness or organized by the reality principle, a scientific
bias hostile to knowledge's dialectic. Instead, we must recognize the ego's
inherent méconnaissance, notably articulated by Anna Freud. Verneinung
represents a patent form of this function, with latent effects only illuminated
by acknowledging the id's manifestations.
Understanding the inertia of ego formations provides a
broad definition of neurosis, while the captation of the subject by the
situation offers insight into madness—both within and beyond asylum walls. The
sufferings of neurosis and psychosis serve as a lesson in soul passions, while
psychoanalysis unveils society's numbing of these passions.
At the intersection of nature and culture, psychoanalysis
identifies the imaginary servitude inherent in love, a knot that must
continually be undone or severed. We remain skeptical of altruistic sentiments,
recognizing the underlying aggressivity in philanthropy, idealism, pedagogy,
and reform.
In our practice, psychoanalysis guides patients to the
ecstatic revelation of mortal destiny encapsulated in "Thou art
that," but it cannot single-handedly embark them on the journey where true
transformation begins.
No comments:
Post a Comment