In "Marxism and Ideology," Jorge Larrain explores
the evolution of Marxist theories regarding ideology and its implications for
theory and practice. Larrain argues that Marx's original "negative"
conception of ideology, which views it as distorted ideas that obscure real
social contradictions, is superior to later "positive" conceptions
put forth by subsequent Marxist theorists. These later conceptions often define
ideology as the totality of social consciousness or the political ideas of
social classes.
Throughout his analysis, Larrain contrasts Marx's and
Engels' critical view of ideology with the more neutral interpretations offered
by figures such as Kautsky, Plekhanov, Bernstein, Lenin, Lukács, Gramsci,
Althusser, and Habermas. He suggests that these later interpretations depart
from the original intent of Marx and Engels by neutralizing the critical
content of the concept, effectively transforming Marxism into just another
ideology.
Larrain attributes the shift from a negative to a positive
conception of ideology to various factors, including the absence of "The
German Ideology" from the early Marxist discourse. He also connects it to
the rise of strong European working-class movements and Lenin's emphasis on
revolutionary practice, which shifted the focus of ideology away from masking
contradictions to highlighting class struggle. While Gramsci is seen as
creatively developing the positive concept of ideology, Larrain criticizes
Althusser for his ambiguous stance and Habermas for allegedly failing to
recognize the material basis of domination.
However, Larrain struggles to explain why Marxist theorists
familiar with "The German Ideology" continued to embrace positive
conceptions of ideology. He suggests that it may have become ingrained as the
orthodox interpretation. Overall, Larrain's analysis offers valuable insights
into the complex evolution of Marxist theories on ideology and their
implications for Marxist theory and practice.
The latter portion of the book delves into an extensive
examination of how the discourse on ideology shapes Marxist concepts such as
class, contradiction, inversion, and the base-superstructure relationship. The
final chapter, titled "Critique of Ideology or End of Ideology,"
staunchly defends Marx's viewpoint regarding the connection between
revolutionary practice and the critique of ideology in resolving contradictions
and transcending ideology itself. Larrain critiques the perspectives of
Mannheim, Althusser, Habermas, and Bell, particularly challenging Bell's
"end of ideology" thesis by asserting that the end of ideology can
only be realized in a realm of freedom, i.e., communist society, rather than in
socialist society.
While the book achieves its aim of providing a detailed
conceptual analysis of ideology in Marx and Marxism, it occasionally veers into
polemics as Larrain seeks to champion what he perceives as the authentic Marx
against later Marxist theorists' supposed distortions. This tendency sometimes
obscures the ongoing relevance of Marxist theory, as Larrain's focus on the
dichotomy between negative and positive conceptions of ideology can become
repetitive. Additionally, the book lacks consideration of the influence of
non-Marxist thinkers, particularly Weber, on Marxist debates, and it overlooks
the social and political context of Marxist thought. Instead, it offers an
etymological exploration of the ideology concept through comparative textual
analysis, ultimately leaving the discussion largely where Marx himself left it,
rather than providing a fresh perspective on the role of ideology in Marxism.
No comments:
Post a Comment